Talk:Rigid spine syndrome
 | Rigid spine syndrome was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 12, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Rigid spine syndrome/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Rathod Dharmarajsinh (talk · contribs) 16:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: C.Fred (talk · contribs) 02:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Failed "good article" nomination[edit]
This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of April 12, 2024, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: ✗ Fail. Very choppy writing with a lot of one-sentence paragraphs and one-paragraph sections.
- 2. Verifiable?:
Pass - 3. Broad in coverage?: Borderline. Lacking a history of discovery of the syndrome.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
- 5. Stable?: ✗ Fail. Article not even 24 hours old.
- 6. Images?: ✗ Fail. No images.
This article is probably Start quality, low C at best. It needs a lot of copyediting before it will be ready to be a Good Article candidate.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far. —C.Fred (talk) 02:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)