Talk:Ring a Ring o' Roses/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dwaipayanc (talk · contribs) 22:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is a very interesting and entertaining article. Some minor observation, before we say this is a GA, are as follows:

In Early attestation section, "The rhyme must already have been widely distributed" sounds editorialized, and needs a citation.
Shropshire, Lancashire: needs wikilink.
"In 1892, Alice Gomme could give twelve versions" I think a small descriptor of Gomem is needed here. Who was Gomme?
" Peter and Iona Opie remarked" A small descriptor would be nice.
"The explanation appeared very late" probably needs re-wording. It is vague, unless you give approximate date in this sentence (the approx date has been mentioned earlier, but here also would be ok). Or else, some other re-wording?
"The following are the seven earliest reports known to us in Britain&nbsp... In only four of these recordings is sneezing a feature" nbsp formatting to be fixed.
"Branle, calandre, La Fille d'Alexandre, La pêche bien mûre, Le rosier tout fleuri, Coucou toupi – En disant 'coucou toupi', tous les enfants quie forment la ronde, s'accroupissent"" what does this mean in English?--Dwaipayan (talk) 22:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for these. I think I have fixed the issues. Is there anything else that needs changing?--SabreBD (talk) 21:17, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think any other major changes are needed. I will be back soon to complete the ga assessment.--Dwaipayan (talk) 02:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks.--SabreBD (talk) 19:18, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, this article meets GA criteria.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:24, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks Dwaipayan. Much appreciated.--SabreBD (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]