Talk:Rioceras

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Cephalopods (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cephalopods, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CephalopodsWikipedia:WikiProject CephalopodsTemplate:WikiProject CephalopodsCephalopods articles

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

On Taxonomy[edit]

I left Rioceras in the Baltoceratidae (see taxobox) as it was originally placed by Rousseau Flower when he established and defined the genus in 1964 and where it was retained by him and Richard Hook in 1977 even though Kröger,Beresi,Landing (2007) reassigned it to the Ellesmeroceratidae on what I consider very good reasoning. Any suggestions? If someone redoes the taxobox to put it in the Ellesmeroceratidae instead, it'll be fine with me, or it can be left as is with the alternative discussed in the text.

Regards fellow paleocephalophiles J.H.McDonnell (talk) 15:19, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]