This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Among his most noted accomplishments are showing (relative to the existence of an inaccessible cardinal) that it is consistent with ZF
Whats the it? Set Theory? --Salix alba (talk) 18:51, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"That every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable". Granted, the sentence structure may not be completely transparent; any suggestions? --Trovatore (talk) 19:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is how set theorists describe their independence results. It is easy to get used to it. Kope (talk) 06:20, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm basically looking for a replacement for the word it in the above sentence. --Salix alba (talk) 07:39, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Among his most noted accomplishments are showing (relative to the existence of an inaccessible cardinal) the consistency with ZF, without the axiom of choice, of the statement, that every set of real numbers is Lebesgue measurable, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kope (talk • contribs) 11:56, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
