Talk:Robert Neuman

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

CSD[edit]

I originally deleted this as SPEEDY, but with my knowledge it has been recreated with some additional material, though I have given no assurance that this will merit its retention. Tyrenius 13:13, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

prod[edit]

I have removed the prod tag, because i consider the article to adequately show N (it was never a valid speedy, though I can understand prod. ). Full professors at major universities, & F.State counts as one now, are N. their Notability has been validated by the process of peer review by other scholars, and that is sufficient. & the official web site is the adequate documentation. Of course one wants to say more, & more can generally be found, but people in the humanities have many fewer (but lengthier) publication records than in the sciences. (I am not the same person who worked on the article previously--this is entirely independent of previous discussions about the article. I am going to add a little more, but I think the article is defendable as is). DGG 03:08, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]