This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This "article" is practically a puff piece for Senator Sampson, with everything in it written positively about him. 100.0.97.27 (talk) 21:13, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, no kidding. I just read a news article from the BBC where he was the sole dissenting voice for exonerating supposed witches that were killed in the mid to late 1600s. I wanted to learn more about him, and instead I come across his Wikipedia entry that reads like a book sleeve upselling a struggling author. 129.222.188.20 (talk) 15:42, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is written more as a political Press release than as an impartial scholarly factual article. My bet is that it that Sampson wrote it himself. It needs to be deleted. 98.26.118.96 (talk) 18:20, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
