This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
it seems to me that what i'm about to say violates NPoV, but here it goes. i have lived in NJ my whole life, Torricelli only relinquished his seat when it was ABSOLUTELY clear he was damaged beyond any shot of re-election. This isn't just a claim, it was and is a reality... if somehow that bit could be phrased more accurately, i think that would be more accurate. i do understand that there is a citation to an external article saying this much... but come on... it should be in the article too - maybe just an illustration of the timing and the polling
The Torricelli Principle used to have its own page, now there isn't even a mention of it on the only remaining page for this guy. Just another example of systemic admin bias at Wikipedia. Bob Torricelli was the architect of laws passed under the Clinton Administration which crippled American HUMINT capabilities by eliminating pay-for-intelligence when the asset was deemed unsavory. In a world of shadowy characters, you can't pay any of them for information -- great idea. The following decade of terror speaks for itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.51.182.175 (talk) 16:38, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
