Talk:Robotic telescope

Astronomy High‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Robotics Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

A fact from Robotic telescope appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 September 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that most contemporary robotic telescopes are in the hands of amateur astronomers?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2004/September.

Wikipedia

September 2007[edit]

RTS2 is actually professional-astronomy package, used on professional observatories as well as amateur ones. AudeLA is the same. How should I threat those? --Pkubanek 22:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this article needs some photographs and diagrams! — Nicholas (reply) @ 15:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, so I uploaded a photo in Commons and then I put it in the article --Negadrive 20:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Robotics attention needed[edit]

Check for scope
Check refs and details

Chaosdruid (talk) 02:32, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Robotic telescope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090130014917/http://sierrastars.com/gp/Rigel/RigelTelescope.aspx to http://www.sierrastars.com/gp/Rigel/RigelTelescope.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]