Talk:Rodeo Beach

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

The URL for ref. 4 doesn't work (now); apparently this one reaches the place that that one did: http://www.sfei.org/sites/default/files/RodeoLagoonHEFinalReport116_0.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.171.31 (talk) 15:42, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal merge fromRodeo Cove[edit]

There are separate articles for Rodeo Beach (created 2006, with a small amount of content), and Rodeo Cove (created 2007, with almost no content). Although these features aren't identical, they're inextricable, and one page to cover both seems to make sense. I don't see any other instances in this region of two separate articles covering a bay and its beach. The Rodeo Beach article has more detail, and appears to be a more commonly used name, so I suggest retaining that and making Rodeo Cove into a redirect. A separate section for Rodeo Cove on the beach article could usefully cover marine features. There may be some need to change the West Marin geographic navigation template as well. Rupert Clayton (talk) 00:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds very reasonable to me. —Stepheng3 (talk) 01:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes -- John of Reading (talk) 07:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]