Talk:Roger Dudley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roger Dudley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reliability of contemporary sources[edit]

I would like to point out that just because a historic person states that another person was alive or dead at a certain period of time does not always mean they were. People are imperfect with imperfect memories and imperfect knowledge. In my own family, doing genealogical research, I have discovered numerous errors in records. One should always try to verify basic facts through additional sources. If two sources do not agree then seek a third. My grandfather's grave stone and death record states he was born in 1896 but his birth record, draft record and census records show he was born in 1894. So this means that my grandmother, the source who supplied his date of birth to the town clerk and the person who carved his head stone, was mistaken and got her dates mixed up or my grandfather might have lied to her about his age. Point being that if an official record from Massachusetts in 1956 can be wrong about a date of birth then it is even all the more plausible that someone from over 400 years ago could just as easily be mistaken about the date of death of someone they knew or knew of. Until this is resolved by examining additional sources, no date should be presumed correct for the date of Roger Dudley's death. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9000:FF00:8E:75F7:9E61:F857:54F3 (talk) 02:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]