Talk:Roger Rogerson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Drug trafficker category?[edit]

Category was recently changed from Category:Australian criminals to Category:Australian drug traffickers. Has Rogerson been verified as a drug trafficker? The article notes a 1985 conviction for conspiring to supply heroin, but also notes that this was overturned on appeal; none of the other convictions mentioned are for drug trafficking. Unless he has a standing conviction for something in this line, I'm inclined to change back to the broader category. --Calair 02:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:58, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Roger Rogerson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roger Rogerson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roger Rogerson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:00, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Disgraced"?[edit]

There have been some back-and-forth reverts in the past week or so about whether to use the adjective "disgraced" in the introduction. It's probably time to open a discussion here in an effort to reach some sort of consensus and prevent accusations of edit warring. (For my own part, I was initially opposed to the use of "disgraced" as I thought it was redundant, given that Rogerson's murder conviction was mentioned in the same sentence. However, I've since changed my mind - he could fairly be described as disgraced even prior to the murder, due to having already been found guilty of perverting the course of justice.) Alerting fellow contributors Cart Adolf, Bumbubookworm and Materialscientist. Thanks, Meticulo (talk) 10:43, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's not much to add to what you've written Meticulo. Rogerson himself has often joked that he was going to change his name to "Disgraced Former Detective" due to the volume of articles describing him as such.

There isn't any implied bias, and personally, I don't think that Rogerson was necessarily a bad policeman having worked in the X during his tenure, but this isn't here nor there.

He brought disgrace on the force and the ethos of the NSWPF due to a number of actions that could not be justified, despite his bravery and dedication.

I would rather not partake in an edit war whilst I work to gain access to my old email account and my old contributors account, and would rather be on jovial terms with my fellow editors. Cart Adolf (talk) 11:08, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal outcome[edit]

What was the outcome of his 2020 appeal? I was unable to find a source online. Meticulo (talk) 02:05, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Roger_Rogerson&oldid=1200440443"