Talk:Roland SC-55

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Redirects[edit]

Created Sc-55 and Sound canvas as redirects to this page. Roland Sound Canvas already existed. --HunterZ 16:10, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CM-300 = SC-55 or SC-55MkII?[edit]

The Roland CM-300 and Roland CM-500 (?Roland SC-155?), are to my knowlehede based on the SC-55MkII and include the extended voices. Can sombody that knows more abaut the Souncanvas series check this? 95.88.250.251 (talk) 07:51, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality sounds[edit]

The SC-55 had some really low quality cheap-MIDI sounding voices. What do you think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.8.63.115 (talk) 16:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SCC-1 / MT-32 Emulation Doesn't sound right?[edit]

Hey guys, sorry to not do this in the right format, (don't know any better). Anyway, the sound recordings from the Roland SCC-1 in MT-32 emulation mode for Space Quest 3 and Ultima 6 do not sound right. I have a Roland SCC-1 and used the Roland utilities to load the MT-32 emulation, and it sounds IDENTICAL to the MT-32 recordings you guys have up here. Especially, the one from Space Quest 3 sounds to me like they're attempting to play MT-32 music without actually configuring the SCC-1 to play in MT-32 mode. I can run mine and re-record the sounds files if anyone is interested?

The sound canvas modules that have mt-32 "compatibility" just have samples of the default instruments. It's not in any way emulation. They do no LA synth of their own at all, despite what the article says. They do a somewhat decent job of playing back mt-32 stuff that doesn't use other sysex to modify patches. Space Quest is one example, as it uses customized patches on an actual mt-32.

Post merge information[edit]

A lot of SCC-1-specific information (variants and their patch differences, hardware connections, links to demo songs, etc.) are missing after the merge operation. Why can't Wikipedia serve as a source for technical details in addition to the common information that is available anywhere? --TamaMan (talk) 09:49, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The old SCC-1 article had a lot of useless information and info that isn't specific to the SC-55/SCC-1. - Master Bigode (Talk) (Contribs) 20:41, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Users[edit]

Are they? They're all random kid's TV shows. --2A00:23C7:6587:6101:E9EF:2224:3F94:715C (talk) 11:12, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]