Talk:Roman Josi

Roman Josi has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 26, 2023. (Reviewed version).

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Ice Hockey

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

Switzerland Mid‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Olympics Mid‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Roman Josi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 May 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that defenceman Roman Josi is the Nashville Predators single-season points leader?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Roman Josi.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 09:36, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Josi in 2017

... that defenceman Roman Josi (pictured) is the highest-scoring Swiss-born NHL player? Source: https://www.espn.com/nhl/recap/_/gameId/401272683
- ALT1: ... that defenceman Roman Josi (pictured) is the Nashville Predators single-season points leader? Source: https://www.nhl.com/predators/news/josi-sets-another-franchise-record-leads-preds-over-senators-in-ottawa/c-332751616
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Book of Common Prayer (1928, United States)

5x expanded by HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:55, 18 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Roman Josi; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

I'll review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:39, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Nice expansion! Appears to meet all the criteria, expect there's a few spots needing citations (I've marked them) and a qpq has not been provided. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:15, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BeanieFan11, I have addressed all the CN tags. I will work on my QPQ tomorrow. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BeanieFan11, QPQ done. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. BeanieFan11 (talk) 13:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

Passed. 123Writer ^talk 15:47, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Roman Josi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 1TWO3Writer (talk · contribs) 11:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Part of August 2023 backlog. Good luck.

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Huge paragraphs. I suggest creating subheadings for each season so breaking those paragraphs down will not ruin the flow of the article.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Lead should be expanded with info about international career and possibly his personal life. Some words like "disappointing", "outstanding", etc. are used; I've deleted what I could find, look out for other words to watch.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	CS1. No issues.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	See below
	2c. it contains no original research.	Every statement seems backed by a citation.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Statistics Earwig false positive. No issues.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Is there anything notable that happened since March?
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	No issues.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	See 1b.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No editwarring. Just general fixes recently.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All own work by Wikipedians, shared on Commons.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	All photos of the subject in relevant sections.
	7. Overall assessment.

Spot-check[edit]

1, 12, 16, 25, 39, 48, 54, 69, 73, 87, 92, 101, 116, 123, 139, 142, 158, 168

(48) Is 26:22 in minutes? Hours?
- Minutes. Fixed in article. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 15:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Thanks for the review 1TWO3Writer! Since the Preds did not make the 2023 Stanley Cup playoffs, nothing really has happened since the season ended. However, I will add a couple sentences about how he finished (ie. pts). I will also add refs in the refs section of the awards table. I will also work on expanding/tweaking the lead.HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 15:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, my main issue really though is the big paragraphs, so if you also work on that with all other improvements that'd be great! 123Writer ^talk 15:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HickoryOughtShirt?4 Pinging just in case. 123Writer ^talk 15:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1TWO3Writer, will do! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 15:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HickoryOughtShirt?4 I've taken the liberty to break down the paragraphs for you. Are you happy with those changes? 123Writer ^talk 13:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1TWO3Writer, yes thank you! I'm still not happy with the lead and I realized the international section also needs some work. Is there anything else you have come across? HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 15:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, not at least from a quick re-read. I'll pass the article but feel free to make any further improvements. Good job. 123Writer ^talk 15:46, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.