Talk:Roman architectural revolution

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2019 and 28 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Justinbrock36. Peer reviewers: Hmcclenn.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When did this mysterious revolution happen?[edit]

No clue in the article concerning the time it happened. Khayyam 77 (talk) 14:34, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the language used is too subjective[edit]

I didn't delete "which led to the liberation of the shape from the dictate of the traditional materials of stone and brick" even though it is very interpretive because I though it might be language directly from a source, but it shouldn't be there outside of quotation marks.

I wonder about the last paragraph: "The development of Roman architecture, however, did not remain limited to these new forms and materials. Parallel, an unrelated process of architectural innovation continued unabated which, although less conspicuous, proved their usefulness for solving structural problems and found their way permanently into Western architecture, such as the lintel arch, the independent corbel and the metal-tie.[4]" The lintel and metal tie long predate the Roman empire, as does corbeling. And the independent corbel is more closely associated with Byzantine and medieval architecture. AmateurEditor (talk) 18:51, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article omits one of the biggest parts of the architectural inheritance of Romans, the semicircular arch, in it entirety (Romans did not invent it, but the did make it really popular). I will check the source. Викидим (talk) 19:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]