Talk:Roosevelt Library

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeRoosevelt Library was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 18, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 5, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that during World War II, the Roosevelt Community Library in Minneapolis held storytimes for children, partly to help reduce juvenile delinquency in the Standish neighborhood?

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Roosevelt Community Library/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The article does not meet the Good Article criteria at the present time. It is still generally too short, and there are issues with primarily with criterion #3 (broadness). The article is not very well organized, either, with many short sections, and several subsections under 'Outlook 2010 options' which really just spit back their future plans. Although these plans are from 1999, so it's already a decade old, and there's really nothing about which option was pursued. This section (and the whole article, really) could be pulled into a more cohesive and coherent article. As it stands, it mostly talks about the history and "future" development plans for the library. It doesn't have anything about its current offerings, the site itself, etc. If it's a "community" library, it might help to also include information about its community outreach programs and such (summer reading programs, book clubs, that sort of things).

It might also help editors review the manual of style, as there's a couple of wikification issues as well. Dr. Cash (talk) 23:42, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]