Talk:Rosalía Abreu

Women in Red: Women in STEM (2022)

This article was created or improved during the Women in STEM edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in October 2022. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Primates Low‑importance

	Primates portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cuba Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cuba, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cuba related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CubaWikipedia:WikiProject CubaTemplate:WikiProject CubaCuba articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Cuba task list:

Task list

New article announcements:
Requests: Ambrosio Cave, Calero Cave, Centella Cave, Cuba and the United Nations, Cuban Liberation Army, Cuevas de Punta del Este, Cura Cave, Patana Cave, Pluma Cave
Stubs: Dollar store (Cuba)
Verify: History of Cuba, Fulgencio Batista
Update: Nochebuena
NPOV: Armando Valladares, Delfín Fernández, History of Cuba
Copyedit: Armando Peraza, Bay of Pigs Invasion, Fabio Grobart, Julio Antonio Mella
Cleanup: Abelardo Colomé Ibarra, Antonio Maceo Grajales, Bay of Pigs Invasion, History of Cuba, List of Cubans, Máximo Gómez, War against the Bandits
Style: Fidel Castro
Expand: Cuba–Soviet Union relations, Baseball in Cuba, Religion in Cuba, Havana's International Book Fair, Cuba–Venezuela relations, Antonio Sánchez de Bustamante y Sirven

A fact from Rosalía Abreu appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 November 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that there was an initial agreement for chimpanzees from the private zoo of Rosalía Abreu (pictured) to be part of an experiment to breed a humanzee?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rosalía Abreu.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 02:47, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Rosalía Abreu, 1905

... that in 1915 Cuban animal collector Rosalía Abreu (pictured) was the first person to breed a chimpanzee in captivity? Source: "Anuma, the first chimpanzee to be born in captivity, was born at the colony [Abreu's in Cuba] on April 27, 1915." [1]
- ALT1: ... that there was an initial agreement for chimpanzees from Rosalía Abreu's (pictured) private zoo to be part of an experiment to breed a humanzee? Source: "Despite her very different background, Abreu was sympathetic to Ivanov’s request to mate a male chimpanzee with a female human." [2]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Alfred Skrenda

Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Self-nominated at 19:45, 17 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Lajmmoore, review follows: article moved to mainspace 17 October and exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline to what look to be reliable sources for the subject; I didn't pick up on any overly close paraphrasing from the sources; image is from a 1905 photograph obviously intended for wider distribution so copyright tag used seems reasonable; hooks are interesting, mentioned in the article and check out to source cited; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 09:29, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Lajmmoore: I'm not sure The New York Times's op-ed opinion is reliable for the facts it states; are the facts verified by the SpringerLink publication? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 00:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi theleekycauldron. I can confirm the journal article cited (Wynne 2008) states: "Despite her very different background, Abreu was sympathetic to Ivanov’s request to mate a male chimpanzee with a female human ... Unfortunately, however, the publicity around Ivanov’s plans brought unwelcome attention to Abreu. She apparently received a threatening letter from the Ku Klux Klan for contemplating involvement in an experiment “abominable to the Creator” (Lapin and Fridman 1966, p. 30; Rossiianov 2002). Abreu became fearful of the impact involvement in Ivanov’s scheme might have on her status in respectable Cuban society, and withdrew her consent." All the best - Dumelow (talk) 06:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much Dumelow! Lajmmoore (talk) 13:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on including Robert Yerkes in lead paragraph[edit]

Should the mention of Robert Yerkes be included in the lead paragraph? Is his name or work recognizable enough to add understanding to Rosalía Abreu? I personally think it only adds questions and mention of Robert Yerkes should be moved to a different point in the article. Sergeant Curious (talk) 19:44, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No - Per MOS:LEADBIO, the lead should stay focused on Rosalía Abreu's biography. Yerkes could be mentioned later in the article, but it certainly doesn't belong in the lead. Nemov (talk) 20:23, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes - the lead is a summary of the article, which includes content relating to the fact that Yerkes based significant amounts of his research on Abreu's work and his purchase of animals from her collection was a significant factor is his later career. I have added eugenicist as a descriptor of Yerkes, to clarify somewhat his approach. Lajmmoore (talk) 22:05, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: left a comment on the Women in Red talk page, to gather further opinions. Lajmmoore (talk) 22:15, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. He's only mentioned briefly in one paragraph, and only one of four bluelinked researchers that the article describes as being influenced by Abreu. Singling him out for special mention in the lead smacks of attempted guilt by association (because of the modern negative connections with eugenics, which is not described in the article text as being an interest of Abreu herself) and original research by synthesis (attempting to push the idea that she was a eugenicist by improperly synthesizing other claims rather than by finding proper sourcing for a direct connection). (Note: I was brought here by a neutral announcement of this RFC on WT:WIR.) —David Eppstein (talk) 22:29, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No per David Eppstein. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes why not, per Lajmmoore. It's a short lead. And please don't introduce a subject here by launching an Rfc. Johnbod (talk) 02:22, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No What David Eppstein said, but also much more mundanely, that sentence very much sticks out to me as being irrelevant to the rest of the paragraph. 3mi1y (talk) 06:18, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No Not required in the initial paragraph. Details can be added later in the sections below Mnair69 (talk) 06:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - some commenters are saying that the mention should be removed to later in the article, but I'd like to point out that its already there. Perhaps take a look at the rest of the text before commenting? Lajmmoore (talk) 09:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why is there no discussion of the other researcher who is mentioned in the lead? Why is there just a focus on Yerkes? If the issue is with the lead including people who were significant in Abreu's life then surely this discussion should widen to include Ilya Ivanov also? (Again, some commenters don't appear to have noticed this.) Lajmmoore (talk) 09:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes: Despite the arguments put forward by David Eppstein, it seems to me that the lead summarizes the main reasons why she is remembered, reflecting the content in the body of the article. In some cases, WiR's concern with eliminating the names of male colleagues may be inappropriate. Here, both Yerkes and Ivanov seem to have played important roles in her life. It might nevertheless be useful to expand on their involvement.--Ipigott (talk) 10:45, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but reworded so it is about her not him, on the lines of the mention in text: "Her work influenced / formed the basis of ...". PamD 13:42, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]