Talk:Rose-Lynn Fisher
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Notability[edit]
JohnCD, do you not think that Fisher is notable?
If no you do not, then you might consider:
- http://krant.tijd.be/ipaper/20150530?itm_campaign=newsstream_sabato#paper/sabato_nl/22
- https://www.welt.de/wissenschaft/article132937605/Was-Nahaufnahmen-von-Traenen-verraten.html
- https://www.wired.com/2014/05/rose-lynn-fischer-microscopic-tears/#x
- http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/slide-show-the-topography-of-tears#slide_ss_0
- https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2014/may/14/lood-semen-tears-artists-bodily-fluids-rose-lynn-fisher
- http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/10836061/Structure-of-tears-influenced-by-what-makes-us-cry.html
- http://oglobo.globo.com/cultura/fotografa-cria-arte-partir-de-lagrimas-12736517
- http://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2014/05/13/the-microscopic-tracks-of-my-tears-and-other-news/
- http://www.popsci.com/article/science/microscope-images-show-topography-tears
- http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1643521-la-coleccion-de-lagrimas-de-la-senora-fisher/
And I think that there are more besides. -- Hoary (talk) 22:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Hoary: I don't have time to check all those, but if you believe she is notable, by all means remove the tag and add as many of them as you think useful. I added the tag when declining a speedy immediately after the article was created, with the idea of encouraging its (new) author to improve the references; we had this conversation but they did not do any more. JohnCD (talk) 16:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)