Talk:Rosedale Park, Detroit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Description[edit]

Does Description really need two sections? Murderbike (talk) 17:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Andrew Jameson (talk) 19:16, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move, per discussion at Talk:Greektown, Detroit. -- tariqabjotu 06:32, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Rosedale Park Historic District (Detroit, Michigan)Rosedale Park, Detroit – While the official name of this district is Rosedale Park Historic District, the common name is undoubtedly Rosedale Park. Since there are more than one Rosedale Parks in existence, the Detroit qualification is necessary. Per WP:COMMONNAME, the name of this article should be Rosedale Park, Detroit. Wikipedian77 (talk) 14:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, use of the word Michigan is unnecessary disambiguation. Zarcadia (talk) 09:52, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose See my comments at Talk:Brush Park Historic District. (The issue is the dropping of "Historic District", not the dropping of "Michigan" - which is unnecessary disambiguation as Zarcadia points out). I am opposing because this is one of many current, separate proposals to drop the words "Historic District" from Detroit article titles. Currently all such districts in Detroit use the phrase, as shown at Category:Historic districts in Detroit, Michigan. I think instead of half-a-dozen unconnected individual discussions about whether to delete the phrase, there should be a discussion at some central location about whether or not to include the phrase "Historic District" from Detroit articles, and an overall consensus reached. I am neutral on what that consensus would be. --MelanieN (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: Please see consolidated discussion at Talk:Greektown Historic District. Thank you. Wikipedian77 (talk) 03:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.