Talk:Rotwelsch

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Other cants[edit]

==Other cants==
*[[Argot]] ([[France]])
*[[Cant]] ([[Great Britain]])
*[[Lunfardo]] ([[Argentina]])

I removed this section because it was incomplete (only had 3 items) and its contents were already linked to via the Category:Cant languages.

If it is still thought useful to have such a list shouldn't it be complete? And then maintenance becomes the issue: which is why the category solution is best :) IMHO RCEberwein 15:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most of it is wrong[edit]

Compare it to the German Wikipedia ... it tells totally different things about the vocabulary of Rotwelsch! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.42.173.11 (talk) 02:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For example see Rappen, https://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/berappen, https://www.dwds.de/wb/berappen, https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/An_Etymological_Dictionary_of_the_German_Language/Annotated/berappen for competing etymologies of "berappen".

In my view this casts all of the vocabulary entries in doubt. 85.76.17.167 (talk) 04:56, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

broken link[edit]

link to

http://linguistik.yauh.de/rotwelsch.html

is broken

217.85.78.133 21:48, 20 January 2007 (UTC)j.[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:20, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

the translation of Gaunersprache[edit]

as criminal language seems a little bit odd. A Gauner isn't per se a criminal, but somebody who isn't to be trusted - a potential criminal maybe, but more of an individual with a distinctive level of streetsmarts. He's also a traveller - not bound to land or a common family with all its ties - and earns his living by a variety of dealings, which are everything else than opaque for the average citizen. In short: every criminal could be called a Gauner to some degree, yet not all Gauners will become criminals. A successfull (by which I mean: real) Gauner won't even break the law of the land. Maybe a good comparison is the english con-artist? I know my comment lacks a better translation, but the word itself is scarcely used nowadays in a non-euphemistic or non-reminiscent manner. Perhaps rogues-langue? --78.52.34.110 (talk) 12:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the translation to "crook," as that's the translation used on Wiktionary. -- 2600:1700:F901:430:55C3:7849:F673:CA8E (talk) 14:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Purported Yiddish[edit]

What is written in Hebrew alphabet as purportedly "Kochemer" in the form of "חוכמער" is wrong.

It could be only rendered as Chukmer or maybe Chokamar or something like that, since "ח" is the letter "chet" (with a rasp fricative CH as in some dialetcs of German, not as in English affricate "ch" as in "church") and "כ" is "kaf". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.245.95.254 (talk) 04:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]