Talk:Rotzo Formation

Rotzo Formation was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 29, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Rotzo Formation is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Should be nominated for Featured List, not GA[edit]

Hi Yewtharaptor, I noticed that you nominated this list article for GA. However, as a list, it should instead be nominated as a Featured List. See the criteria here. Thanks, Enwebb (talk) 15:26, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is this some kind of joke? This article is far from anywhere near a GA. See for better examples Tremp Formation. Tisquesusa (talk) 01:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And of course this is not a list, but a formation. Tisquesusa (talk) 01:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rotzo Formation/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 04:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural fail: This article is organized as a list, not a prose article. Therefore, it should be nominated for recognition at WP:FLC, not here. b uidhe 04:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]