Talk:Route reflector

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was nominated for merging with Border Gateway Protocol on August 2019. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was Merge.

Local Point: Was probably supposed to read "Focal Point" (Source http://www.metaswitch.com/products/networking/virtual-route-reflector and others) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.235.105.239 (talk) 23:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IP reporting problem with explanation in source compared to what's in the article.[edit]

I am transferring this comment from the article to this talk page.

BGP Route Reflector Basics

Above link has wrong explanation to router reflector than wiki has. — Special:Contributions/2601:601:102:9792:A170:464D:88FE:6F62 — User talk:2601:601:102:9792:A170:464D:88FE:6F62

Peaceray (talk) 18:53, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

reducing number of CLI statements isn't the goaldriver of RRs.. reducing the number of peering is[edit]

the article focues on lines of CLI config even giving calculations around the number of lines reduced.... This is the wrong way to go about it... it should be about the number of BGP peerings. which grow exponentially in a full mesh but grow linearly with RRs (even with backup RR) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 54.240.193.1 (talk) 02:44, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]