Talk:Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force.

A user named "Rospa" removed a section of the article without comment, should this be reverted? Also, I noticed that the article reads more like a PR handout than an actual article, and needs to be wikified, it almost looks like a copy and pasted webpage. --Zappacky (talk) 13:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is simply an advertisement for the company. It talks about what a good job they are doing...hardly encyclopedic material. Not everyone agrees with their overpowering "saftey prevention".98.227.242.146 (talk) 17:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What sort of information should be added concerning RoSPA to balance the one-sided view. Certainly the River and Lake Swimming Association has listed various inaccuracies in RoSPA's advice. For example Information about RoSPA, and More information about RoSPA, look particularly for the box with the Pinocchio picture. Are there examples of quality Wikipedia articles where controversy and negative views are used to balance promotional material? Ross-c (talk) 12:44, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some information (non-swimming, I mainly know swimming) offering a balanced view of RoSPA. Discussion of driving style and implicit criticism of RoSPA Ross-c (talk) 13:12, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090920112349/http://www.rospa.com/roadsafety/info/cyclist_training_effectiveness.pdf to http://www.rospa.com/RoadSafety/info/cyclist_training_effectiveness.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]