Talk:Rumohra adiantiformis

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Rumohra adiantiformis is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Brazil Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Multiple geographical lnks[edit]

A bugbear of mine is the widespread practice of listing multiple countries, regions, oceans, continents in a single article. And providing a blue link to each one. This is really not helpful. It gives the reader false hope that these general articles will contain more information about this plant - which they don’t. Masses of blue links interfere with the readability of an article, imho.

The species has a wide distribution, we get it! I have therefore removed these links. Darorcilmir (talk) 06:43, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Um... I understand your point, and for countries like Brazil, I agree. However, I'm less sure about smaller countries and regions, and terms like "Australasia" or "Malesia" (which often get 'corrected' to "Australia" and "Malaysia"). Peter coxhead (talk) 12:02, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It’s so annoying ... it detracts from the genuinely interesting and informative links. I don’t object to the lists themselves, just the automatic linking of every single country. Darorcilmir (talk) 17:17, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]