Talk:Rune (video game)

Fair use rationale for Image:Rune1.jpg

Image:Rune1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Readability

Could someone who knows something about the game fix the last sentence for the Dwarven Battle Hammer? I can't figure out what "In multiplayer, the Battle Hammer is functional and works fine in pretty much every situation in comparison to Work sword, it's more secure." is trying to say. Thanks. -Nesoo (talk) 01:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Fixed it, among with a few other things I found misleading or biased. Overall cleaned up most of the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.229.50.111 (talk) 19:26, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

External links

One of the external links ("Rune Clan listings and information" - http://www.runehordes.info) is now "dead". Runehordes.info shut down a couple of months ago, so any information found on that site is old and outdated. Should the link remain or be taken away? Or should there be a note made somewhere saying it's no longer reliable in terms of up-to-date information? The site still contains a gigantic list of clan history in Rune, although it can't be updated anymore. And the creator said he'd keep the website itself up for the overseeable future. I don't usually involve myself in the editing of wikipedia articles, so I don't know what standard procedure in cases like this is. So I'll leave it to someone else to make the decision, just thought I'd inform you about it. 85.229.50.111 (talk) 02:30, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

"RUNE HORDES dot INFO" (Runehordes.info) link is still alive as of this writing (March 31, 2009) The owner decided to keep the site "alive" after it closed for a while back in mid 2008. The forums might not be as active (you have to register to be allowed in) However,newly formed Rune Clans are still able to register to add any pertinent data for listing purposes through the Home page's "Add New Horde". Previously registered Rune Clans are still able to provide up-to-date information through the site's "Changelog". Not all listed clans have a website and/or forum. Instead, they update their membership lists in their Runehordes.info webpage. All this, of course, depending on the registered person (clan leader or member) having the time or remembering to do this. Laurie "the Deepminded" Wise-- RuneGame.com Administrator-- Official Website for Human Head Studios Rune/Rune:Halls of Valhalla (video game) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.185.233.46 (talk) 10:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Who is Nine Realms

why do they own the IP? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.241.150.42 (talk) 01:47, 6 June 2015 (UTC)