Talk:Rush University Medical Center

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hospitals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.rush.edu/. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2007041610016942.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

Initial[edit]

This page is exceptionally biased and could use some objective revision. 24.97.30.210 (talk) 16:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like this page consists of text copied and pasted from the website of the institution in question. It is biased and not very helpful. Trizado (talk) 02:54, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS[edit]

The content on this page is similar to content on www.rush.edu, for which Rush University Medical Center owns the copyright. We permit its use on Wikipedia. Troberthatcher (talk) 19:46, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganized. Moved material from intro to sections.[edit]

The introduction was ridiculously long, so I cut and pasted most of the material into various sections. It's still blatantly self-promotional drivel and completely unsourced, but at least it looks more like an encyclopedia article.

Also, I propose deleting the list of trustees. A quick survey of Wikipedia entries about well-known hospitals shows that their pages don't include a list of trustees. Also, I don't think anyone cares who the trustees are.Oanjao (talk) 18:59, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]