This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brighton, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BrightonWikipedia:WikiProject BrightonTemplate:WikiProject BrightonBrighton articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British crime, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.British crimeWikipedia:WikiProject British crimeTemplate:WikiProject British crimeBritish crime articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Pedophilia Article WatchWikipedia:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchTemplate:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchPedophilia Article Watch articles
Should this page now be renamed Russell Bishop (murderer)? Peadar Ó Croidheáin 22:34, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No objection. No suggestion that this conviction will be appealed. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. According to this, there is a 28-day time limit to apply for permission to appeal. This expires today. It can be reasonably assumed that if any appeal is applied for, then it will be widely reported within a short space of time. I say give it just a few more days just to check if anything emerges, and if not, then do the rename. --Money money tickle parsnip (talk) 08:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Still no report of an appeal (searched via Google News). Per the above, I am now going to do the rename. --Money money tickle parsnip (talk) 21:36, 10 January 2019 (UTC) I have now also checked that there are no double redirects that need fixing. --Money money tickle parsnip (talk) 21:41, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This person is only notable due to the Babes in the Wood murders (Wild Park), the key content here could be merged into the Russell Bishop section of that article. The information here is also poorly presented and mis-ordered. Mountaincirquetalk 14:11, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support this. There's stuff in here that's more relevant to the case than to the biography, that can transfer. That stuff here that's frankly just padding and isn't needed in either. ——Serial 10:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the above comments. There is precedent for this with other similar articles, such as Leopold and Loeb (although this is simply evidence that a merge is acceptable, not necessary). Bibeyjj (talk) 22:09, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
