Talk:Russian ironclad Petropavlovsk

Russian ironclad Petropavlovsk has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 2, 2013. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Russian ironclad Petropavlovsk appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 October 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Russian ironclad Petropavlovsk was the flagship of the Baltic Fleet during the 1860s and 1870s?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Russian ironclad Petropavlovsk.

Wikipedia

Military history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Russia: Technology & engineering / Military Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Russian ironclad Petropavlovsk/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 22:29, 30 June 2013 (UTC) Review will commence in a few days. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 22:29, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Lead & Infobox[edit]

Unless it is mentioned within your reference texts, how are you sure the vessel was named for the siege of Petropavlosk and not Petropavlosk? I assume it is mentioned in the given source?

See the first sentence of the Construction and service section.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:12, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I was/am asking if you can confirm within your sources that the moniker is topical to the siege, as opposed to the city. As I said, I assume you can? QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:01, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's named for the siege.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:03, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Description[edit]

Fine here.

Construction and service[edit]

I know in most of your previous articles, you mention the location of the ship's scrapping. Is it not possible to in this article? QatarStarsLeague (talk) 14:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know for sure, but it was probably Saint Petersburg. But that's just my guess.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:13, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you cannot source this information, that is fine. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:02, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]