Talk:São Tomé and Príncipe at the 2012 Summer Olympics

São Tomé and Príncipe at the 2012 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 17, 2015. (Reviewed version).

A fact from São Tomé and Príncipe at the 2012 Summer Olympics appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 January 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that both of São Tomé and Príncipe's athletes at the 2012 London Games finished last in their heats?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/São Tomé and Príncipe at the 2012 Summer Olympics.

Wikipedia

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Sao Tome & Principe Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	São Tomé and Príncipe portal This article is supported by WikiProject Sao Tome and Principe.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:São Tomé and Príncipe at the 2012 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Disc Wheel (talk · contribs) 22:49, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I made minor adjustments, but overall good work! Disc Wheel (Talk + Tontributions) 22:49, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]