Talk:SAML 1.1

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Clarification suggested

In the section discussing the 4 steps of the Browser/POST profile, I feel some clarification would be appropriate. The part "Respond with an HTML Form" does not indicate how the URI for the form's action attribute (in other words, the URI to which the form will be submitted) is determined by the Identity Provider building the form. When the principal makes a request to the IdP, the only URI supplied to the IdP is the "target" URI: namely, the resource at the service provider the principal ultimately would like to get to. When the IdP builds the form, how the IdP has obtained the action URI to use is left completely out of the discussion, by my reading. The article would be improved by including this. mariox19 (talk) 14:24, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Possible Response

The answer is the same for both SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0: "These and other endpoint locations may be recorded in metadata files. Exactly how the identity provider obtains a trusted metadata file, or otherwise determines the trusted endpoint locations of a particular service provider, is out of scope with respect to SAML 1.1." Tom Scavo (talk) 18:13, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sigat[edit]

Sigat 103.81.105.85 (talk) 10:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]