Talk:SAP SuccessFactors

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Initial posting[edit]

Hello --

We're in the process of creating content for the rest of the site. This is not promotional, but rather an additional source for folks to find out information about SuccessFactors. Please don't delete.

Thanks, Sara

COI on this article[edit]

Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#Promotional article production on behalf of clients reads as follows:

Editors should not create articles which serve solely to promote their subject. All Wikipedia articles should contain useful information written as if from a neutral point of view. The writing of "puff pieces" and advertisements on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited. If you contribute to Wikipedia on behalf of clients, you owe it to both them and the encyclopedia to make very sure you understand the standards for content here, and do not insert promotional material.

Just to not even take the risk of being out of line with Wikipedia:Harassment#Posting of personal information (even though in my opinion it was not) I have removed a link that I had added to this page a few minutes ago, and I will just point out the pronoun "We" above. KConWiki (talk) 01:04, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's any secret that Sara Schulte is a paid PR agent for the article subject. In itself that would not be a problem were policies (eg WP:N, WP:V, WP:NPOV, etc.) followed. -- samj _in ^out 14:49, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In fact editors are specifically discouraged from editing articles for which they have a CoI, see WP:COI and specifically WP:FINANCIALCOI. 24.130.189.187 (talk) 01:21, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Buzzword Tag[edit]

I removed the buzzword tag, I read it through and I don't think it's noticeably buzzword filled anymore. Any thoughts? Happy to pop it back in if people disagree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DerekErickson (talk • contribs) 09:39, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Switch to updated logo[edit]

Hello. It would be great if we could switch to the updated logo. The link can be found below, thanks! https://www.google.com/search?q=sap+successfactors+logo&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjK2u_9y4jbAhVBNd8KHTvbCtUQ_AUICigB&biw=1440&bih=638#imgrc=HLxG2aF9T-m18M. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicoledas05 (talk • contribs) 21:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]