Talk:SCMOS

Photography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Reads too much like advertising material?[edit]

I came to this page to see how sCMOS is different from CMOS. This article states that it is somehow better in various respects (improved low-light capability, large field of view, etc.) but provides essentially no information as to why that is. The provided circuit layout of a CMOS inverter seems out of place, it has nothing to do with sCMOS<->CMOS. Wenzeljakob (talk) 23:16, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]