Talk:SHACL

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Holger Knublauch (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional. The tone is not that bad and really, ~~the biggest issue is that there's no ref (could be a hoax, but it's not an obvious one) and that, if we assume good faith,~~ the only large problem is that it's very short and lacks content. -- 69.165.196.103 (talk) 23:57, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it is about an official W3C standard that is being developed by an independent consortium of research and industry organizations. SHACL is a free open standard without any commercial string attached. I have placed this page there as a starting point and have announced it to our community. I expect more edits will follow soon, but how else can we get started if the page has to be perfect from day one? --Holger Knublauch (talk) 00:21, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it describes a W3C standard --2606:A000:45C3:2000:9D8C:858C:5341:D765 (talk) 00:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Find no conflict of interest[edit]

The information provided is highly relevant, both the text and the references provided. We do have a 'connected contributor', thanks for sharing your knowledge, but we do not need the COI editnotice. I intend to remove it after a week or so, unless some have reasons to protest. -- Hedgehog41 (talk) 21:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removed 'COI editnotice' -- Hedgehog41 (talk) 22:07, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]