Talk:SHARE (computing)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GUIDE[edit]

I added a paragraph on GUIDE, the other IBM mainframe users group, and its transition to SHARE. Technically, I suppose this might belong in a separate article; however, since the group is now defunct, such an article would never grow beyond a stub. Terry Carroll 16:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I created a stub for GUIDE, I adapted some information from your paragraph, plus other material. Peter Flass (talk) 13:07, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The History of free software article has a section about the pre-1983 state of communities that could now be called free software communities. DECUS and SHARE seem to be two such communities, but there is little info about them in the "history of.." article.

The current content of that article is lacking in references/citations, so it would be great if anyone could add more info, with references, about the DECUS/SHARE situations. Thanks. Gronky 11:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added a reference to SOS and a paragraph on the SPLA to the history article. Peter Flass (talk) 23:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on SHARE (computing). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Originally, IBM delivered only hardware[edit]

"Originally, IBM distributed its operating systems in source form[2][3][4]" suggests, incorrectly, that IBM provided basic software which SHARE elaborated. IBM never provided an operating system for the 704, the machine around which SHARE coalesced. The standard [Symbolic Assembly Program] (SAP) was written by Roy Nutt of United Aircraft. BESYS from Bell Labs was one of several operating systems that customers put on the bare iron that IBM delivered. Fortran was the only major program that I remember IBM providing in that era. It was a standalone program that booted itself, used the whole memory, and halted when done. The computer operator then manually recorded the stop location, which served as an index into a book of diagnostics. The source (written in SAP) was supplied; it was not easy to subjugate to a nonstop operating system. IBM did provide an operating system, IBSYS, for the 7090, successor to the 704. I don't have enough proper references at hand to attest these facts, but facts they are. Mdmi (talk) 03:09, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the wording a bit. I can't find the reference right now, but IBM provided a monitor with FORTRAN IV (I believe) that did batch processing; this might have been adapted from a user effort as well. Peter Flass (talk) 16:21, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]