Talk:SM-65E Atlas

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Last Atlas E/F Launch[edit]

This article says "24 March 1995". Whereas the article Atlas_E/F says "Saturday 24 March 2001". Who's right? --78.94.76.211 (talk) 22:18, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you requested a source for the last edits[edit]

The complete launch report for Atlas 32E is online (if you do a few seconds of Google search) and contains all the details about this rather spectacular failure. Unfortunately I can't find any video or photos of it except one still picture of the booster on the pad prior to liftoff.

151.213.61.66 (talk) 20:03, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's cool. There is a lot of material on the GREAT BIG world wide web. But if you want a set of claims to stick around long term in the Wikipedia, then it will often be necessary to provide a verifiable source citation when another editor asks you to do so. The burden of evidence is on the editor who adds or retains unsourced material.

That particular new IP editor had added, in good faith I'm sure, quite a bit of detailed material to ten or so articles that was not sourced. It was reverted until a source can be found for the new claims that were added. Cheers. N2e (talk) 05:46, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, IP editor (who has apparently now used the last three different IP addresses that made edits to the article, which all came from the same internet service provider in the same region of the US), for adding a source to the edits you made to the article! Good on ya. N2e (talk) 00:21, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]