Talk:SMS Prinz Heinrich/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 21:41, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    prose: (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments[edit]

1. as opposed Fürst Bismarck. Suggest - as opposed to the Fürst Bismarck

  • Added "to", though I don't like using "the" with a ship name, but that's just a taste issue. Parsecboy (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2. including during the Battle of the Gulf of Riga in August 1915. Suggest - and was involved in the Battle of the Gulf of Riga in August 1915

3. hp in the infobox could do with a link.

4. and used in several secondary roles. Suggest - and was used in several secondary roles

5. amidships could do with a link.

6. and a top speed of. Suggest - and had a top speed of

7. with relief effort. Suggest - with the relief effort

  • I'm not sure why I missed so many little things like that - must've been distracted when I wrote the article. Parsecboy (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

8. Miller apparatus. Suggest a link for this

  • I don't know that there'll ever be an article for this. I've only seen it referenced in the article in Industrial Magazine (and its probably an informal name for whatever the USN designated it as).

9. Suggest a link for van.

10. von Ingenohl. Is he the ships Capitan?

  • The admiral of the fleet - I've clarified this. Parsecboy (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 21:41, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work Parsec, once again. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 15:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]