Talk:SM UC-5

Military history: Maritime / European / German / World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sourcing Issues[edit]

The end of the "Fate" section is speculation based on a YouTube comment on a Mark Felton video. There are issues with Mark Felton's videos that make them suspect as a secondary source as it is, but using the comments on his video is a whole other level. I'm editing that out per WP:RS. A YouTube comment is not a reliable, published source. Rather it is an example of "User-Generated Content" which is often considered to be "unacceptable" as a source on Wikipedia (as would be YouTube videos as well, but that's a struggle for another day).

CatharticHistorian (talk) 14:49, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]