Talk:Sagittarius

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of Fairy Tail characters#Celestial Spirits|''Fairy Tail'' character]] The anchor (#Celestial Spirits) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Under Astronomy, who put in the text "Sagittarius (constellation), corresponding to the astrological sign" ? or more precisely, why? The constellation has nothing to do with the astrological sign, and under the Astronomy section "Sagittarius (constellation)" is sufficient.

The reverse issue exists under Astrology "a Zodiac sign corresponding to the constellation."

If no-one disagrees within 30 days I'll make the edits, cheers. Cathi M (talk) 15:13, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is a connection in peoples' minds - and are both part of teh zodiac. YEs it's illogical and woo-ey but it exists Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:11, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Surely Wikipedia should educate rather than allow misconceptions to continue? The two objects are quite different, take up different portions of the zodiac for example. Both entries are there on the disambiguation page, distinguishing between them is what disambiguation pages are for. Both sets of people will be able to find the Sagittarius they're looking for without the entries having to be cross-referenced in this misleading way. Cathi M (talk) 21:39, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So why not have a sentence/footnote that points out the misconception and non-alignment rather than just delete it wholesale? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:30, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]