Talk:Said Hamulić

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 24 April 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Diverging Diamond To the left! To the right! 14:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Said HamulićSaïd Hamulic – Per WP:DIACRITICS. Most sources use Dutch "Saïd Hamulic" and not Bosnian "Said Hamulić". Piotr Bart (talk) 13:18, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose we don't count sources which are not enabled for full fonts. It's evident that Dutch sources with full fonts are spelling fully nl:Said Hamulić as "De vijf Nederlanders van Toulouse FC (Thijs Dallinga, Stijn Spierings, Branco van den Boomen, Zakaria Aboukhlal en Said Hamulić) kunnen hun mooie seizoen extra glans geven door de bekerfinale te bereiken. Op hun route naar Parijs is FC Annecy, de nummer 15 van de Ligue 2, de laatste horde." etc In ictu oculi (talk) 14:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    You wikilinked to nothing. Also, what do you mean "not enabled for full font"? If they can spell "ï" they could surely spell "ć" if they meant to. You can see those Dutch sources provided in Dutch article use "Saïd Hamulic" (here and here). Also it's English Wikipedia, so what matters is what English-language media call it.
    In English-language media we got from databases: TransferMarkt, Soccerway, goal.com, Eurosport, ESPN, SkySports
    From articles: The Scottish Sun
    Also, not English-language, but it's spelled that way at his club's website and his former club's website.
    It seems like some people are combining both spellings into "Saïd Hamulić" eg. World Football, OneFootball, which still is not what the article is called now. Piotr Bart (talk) 15:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 22:16, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per IIO; I also note that nominator has not presented any sources. GiantSnowman 22:19, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.