Talk:Sakhalin-I

A news item involving Sakhalin-I was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 1 February 2011.

Wikipedia

Russia: Technology & engineering / Economy / Physical geography High‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the economy of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the physical geography of Russia task force.

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Link[edit]

I dod not know how I should add a link to the TV show on the subject Extreme Engineering on Discovery Channel. Someone please add this link in correctly.

Don't know how to do the link, but I have seen a repeat of the show on U.K.T.V.--86.25.53.161 05:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Yep.--86.29.252.167 13:21, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was also on the decovery channel to.--86.29.247.229 (talk) 19:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

unemployment[edit]

Corrected the ridiculous claim that Sakhalin-1 made unemployment non-existent in Sakhalin. Radchenk (talk) 13:01, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Context[edit]

Congratulations to all involved for making In The News, but you know what that means... stupid question time! Specifically, it would be nice to understand whether these world record boreholes are something that can only happen in this one spot due to it being a subduction zone, or could there be similar wells in the works all the way around the Pacific Ring of Fire, or even elsewhere? Also, it would be nice to get an idea of the depth of this well relative to the Moho discontinuity in this same spot. Wnt (talk) 08:02, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"depth"[edit]

This article repeatedly refers to the length of the hole as its "depth." But, in fact, the depth is how deep it goes; that is, its distance from the surface of the earth.

In the case of wells which are dug beneath the sea, "depth" could refer to either the distance below the seabed, or the distance below the surface of the sea. But it certainly doesn't mean the total length of the hole including the horizontal portion. NCdave (talk) 09:44, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

12345[edit]

Did they intend to dig that hole exactly 12345 metres deep, or is it just a coincidence? JIP | Talk 18:46, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sakhalin-I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090804230149/http://www.iucn.org/wgwap/about_the_initiative/history_of_engagement/ to http://www.iucn.org/wgwap/about_the_initiative/history_of_engagement/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]