This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
The statements included on the main page give the appearance of bias against the proposed mining operations. How can we reword this to keep a neutral point of view? Imzadi1979 17:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a POV issue here. Sulfide mining can cause the type of polution described, and Kennecott is proposing to build a mine in the region and use the river for drainage. It seems pretty straightforward to me.StudierMalMarburg 22:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think I have fixed the POV issue, the old POV was very pointed and NOT neutral. Djoeyd114 23:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
