This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Hello Turktimex3. I assure you that my edits are not vandalism, please stop making such unfounded accusations. The reasons for my changes are identified in each of the edit summaries. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
it is texbook vandalism, when you remove reliable sourced information. what possible consensus reason could you have for removing NYTimes and Guardian book review references? you need to demonstrate that you will comply with policy, not vindictively right all great COI wrongs. --Turktimex3 (talk) 15:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please learn what vandalism means on Wikipedia, before you make these serious accusations. Have you looked through the Edit Summaries? The reasons for the changes are stated there. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Removing encyclopedic content without any reason, or replacing such content with nonsense." Wikipedia:Vandalism. --Turktimex3 (talk) 16:03, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That is part of the explanation (and please note the "without any reason" wording), however the key point is at the top. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
provide a reason to remove a NYTimes book review, if you have any.--Turktimex3 (talk) 15:58, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
