This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bible Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jewish history Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Near East Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Likeness to Abu Bakr Section[edit]

This section is not relevant to the figure of Samiri, nothing in it relates to him or who he is. The views in it are political opinions of the historical figure Abu Bakr by shia muslims. Aby Bakr was the first Khalifah in islam after the prophet (saws) and he was a Khalif before the shia sect came into existence, there opinions on him are their interpretation of history and events. The Shia sect is roughly 5-12% of the world Muslim population, so sectarian minority opinions of who Abu Bakr was are being represented as mainstream Islam. The Majority of Muslims ~90% accept Abu Bakr as the legitimate first Khalif and this is reflected academically. So this entire section should be deleted due to its irrelevance to who samiri was and for it's sectarian bias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.216.100.151 (talk) 04:53, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Connection with Zimri/Lack of Scholarly Opinions regarding Samiri's Identity[edit]

This article, in my opinion, needs more scholarly commentary regarding the identity of Samiri. True, some have identified him with Zimri, but other scholars and classical Qur'anic commentators remaiBLOBVIS e needs to present and discuss these differing views. To simply equate Samiri with Zimri based solely on some similarities in their characters without addressing the diversity of opinion among the commentators does readers a great disservice.

You're right, there is nothing even approaching consensus over the link between Samiri and Zimri. I added some other opinions and possible identities. Dragoon17 (talk) 18:29, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

Should he be referred to as "Samiri" or "as-Samiri/al-Samiri" or "the Samiri" or something else? The Quran and most Arabic sources use the prefix (السامري) because without the prefix (سامري) it can just mean "Samaritan", but English sources seem to have no agreed-upon term. If it's kept as "Samiri", then it should be either linked to on Samaritans or a disambiguation page should be created, because right now "Samiri" redirects there. Dragoon17 (talk) 18:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Islamic figure"[edit]

Isn't it a bit strange to refer to this man as an "Islamic" figure? In the religion, the word Islam refers to the Submission to Allah, whereas this individual was known as a Kafir and Mushrik. At very least this should be changed to "Samiri (Hebrew figure)" or "(Israelite figure)".MuslimKnight786 (talk) 02:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ALthough the figure itself is not a Muslim or himself portrayed as following the religion of Islam, it is a figure from the religion of Islam. Since Samiri is not a historical person, he is neither a Hebrew nor an Israelite. He is a figure from the religion called Islam.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 22:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How can Moses have met a Samari....[edit]

when he(Moses) lived between 1400 and 1200 BC while the first Samaris exist at least 300 years later arround 900 BC??

Surah 20:85-88 therefore looks like a historical error which would indiciate and prove that the Quran cannot be from God. 80.131.59.246 (talk) 01:42, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moses is a fictional character. The writers of his fairy tales could place him at any point in time. Dimadick (talk) 23:33, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In contrast to the account given in the Hebrew Bible, the Quran does not blame Aaron for the calf’s creation.[edit]

In contrast to the account given in the Hebrew Bible, the Quran does not blame Aaron for the calf’s creation. 2409:40F0:FA:3047:689C:8D4B:2BEA:90B6 (talk) 14:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]