Talk:Samuel Fields

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not a General[edit]

There is no proof that this man was ever a General in the Army, why should he be labeled as such? Egonil (talk) 06:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The artical only refers to him as having clamed to be. 182.239.144.204 (talk) 10:18, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]