Talk:Samuele Bacchiocchi

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Seventh-day Adventist Church High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

Italy

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Conspiracy theory[edit]

I tagged the conspiracy theory as non-neutral because it seems to be a biased account of events written by someone with a vested interest. Is it important enough to show up in any independent reliable sources? If no, I suggest it be removed altogether. --Flex (talk/contribs) 14:39, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The non-neutral is unwarrented due to the nature and subjectivity of conspiracy theories themselves. I do not have a vested interest. I wish to present other conspiracy theories that have been well documented other than the one given. [[User:hop_goblin (talk/13:10, 11 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hop goblin (talk • contribs)

Wikipedia does not judge the truth-value of conspiracy theories or any other point. Rather, it merely outlines the different arguments and those who represent them, on a disputed point (WP:NPOV). Thus it outlines who makes the argument, with the length of treatment given corresponding to the significant of the perspective. If a perspective is very small (within the context of a particular article) then it should not be mentioned at all, by due weight. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do think the minority POV suspicious of Bacchiocchi is maybe worth including, but only very briefly per due weight. Hence I have shortened it considerably. I kept the Alberto Rivera reference, as he is the most prominent source apparently – he is notable enough to have his own Wikipedia article. However he is a very questionable source. I justify the inclusion only on the basis that a small but visible segment actually believe this. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 07:23, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What Colin MacLaurin did seems fine to me; it puts the source in its likely proper perspective. By the way, is there any way we could find a photo of Mr. Bacchiocchi? Kansan (talk) 03:55, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Samuele Bacchiocchi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070610132535/http://www.biblicalperspectives.com:80/books/sabbath_to_sunday/ to http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/books/sabbath_to_sunday/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]