Talk:San Francisco Department of Public Works corruption scandal
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Show citation statistics for CS1 and CS2 citation elements in the article.
Stats: unnamed refs = 0; named refs = 0; self closed = 0. Click show for details.
I approved this, however I don't think this is necessarily the most logical way to write an article like this. Should probably be more chronological and less on specific people involved. Decently referenced though. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Further: Should probably have something like a background section, how the scandal was uncovered, then the legal proceedings, then aftermath/analysis. A lot of that content is here (hence why I approved it) it would just be better arranged in that manner PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:36, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
