Talk:Sand boil

US Army Corps of Engineers[edit]

The US Army Corps of Engineers has significant expertise concerning sand boils, as they can be a mechanism contributing to levee failure during floods. This article used to contain a link to a June 2006 document (news story?) about sand boils on the USACE web site. Unfortunately, the pre-2008 archives do not seem to have survived a (primarily cosmetic) reorganization of their web site in Jan 2009. [Your tax dollars at work? Does this kind of (false) economy really make sense?] Someone may want to browse other USACE resources about sand boils that are still available on the web site and create a new external link. Piperh (talk) 07:01, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Sand volcano article[edit]

I suggest the two articles are merged (in terms of content, which isn't much) since they contain the same subject just differing terminology. I don't know how to do this however :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.154.138.18 (talk) 03:24, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Anyone up for the task? --Ixfd64 (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree too. Let it be done. When I have time I will merge the two articles. Gug01 (talk) 20:49, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree, if nobody minds, I will start working on it. Paul H. (talk) 22:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done

So, the "sand volcano" article has been merged into the "sand boil" article and "sand volcano" now redirects to "sand boil". This seems to me to be a case of "the tail wagging the dog". A Google search indicates to me that the more common term is "sand volcano" (62,000 versus 12,000 hits). I suggest a better merger would be to revert the current merger then put the "sand boil" text into the "sand volcano" article, and redirect "sand boil" to "sand volcano". GeoWriter (talk) 17:32, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sand boil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:49, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. Netherzone (talk) 20:34, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]