Talk:Sara Ganim

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reorganization of article+[edit]

I feel a little badly stepping in after the work of setting up the article I (feel I) left to others -- I did do early or the first work on Sara at Patriot-News back in Nov. but couldn't get to this article set-up. Anyway, I hope my reorg. to chron. order is OK. It seems more could be done with headings (maybe; it is still relatively compact); with fleshing out (I couldn't get the Glamour piece on-line -- I expect there's more there and elsewhere; I noticed the important March 2011 P-N piece on the grand jury (see P-N article) wasn't yet mentioned here, e.g. also). I'll try; I encourage others. I'm glad it's to where it is and encourage continuing work (even overturning mine if it seems too clumsy; chron. is trad. Wiki, though, in my experience). Cheers. Swliv (talk) 01:26, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What a Superbabe[edit]

I feel a little badly not being Sara Ganim's boyfriend. What a brilliant, beautiful babe. <3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.20.138 (talk) 16:14, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of YouTube links to controversy[edit]

I removed the controversy information as the YouTube links contain copyright violations - I should have used a different edit summary, so my apologies. If it can be appropriately sourced, please revert. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Danny Cevallos[edit]

Ganim and Cevallos are married, and there is a New York Times wedding notice that confirms it. So, after now getting blocked twice trying to add this simple detail to both of their pages, could SOMEONE please take note of this if I get blocked a THIRD time for trying to improve data on Wikipedia? Thanks.

quote about Ganim's reporting[edit]

I remember a quote having to do with Ganim's reporting of the Penn State scandal, it said something like, unusually, people in both camps (at the time who thought Sandusky is innocent and those who thought he was guilty) equally appreciate the accuracy/depth of the reporting. I was trying to find it later using Google search and can't find that quote/reference. I wonder if anyone remembers where it came from.Createangelos (talk) 00:45, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]