Talk:Sarcophagus of Livia Primitiva

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cemeteries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 September 2018 and 14 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ntorres32.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:20, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Evaluation[edit]

Points: 2
Grade: C

Spelling/Grammar[edit]

Meets Expectations Grammar a little messy, switches tenses often.

Language[edit]

Almost meets Expectations not always enclyclopedic sounding

Organization[edit]

Almost meets Expectations Sort of jumps all over the place

Coding[edit]

Meets Expectations

Validity[edit]

Meets Expectations The links to other pages are nice but they still need a little clarification about who or what they are.

Completion[edit]

Meets Expectations What kind of stone? Where was it located? What kind of art was it? What year was it made? No picture.

Relevance[edit]

Meets Expectations

Sources[edit]

Almost meets Expectations Only two sources. Could have a few more.

Citations[edit]

Almost meets Expectations Citations should be in the paragraphs after the things cited.

References[edit]

Almost meets Expectations two sources are from the same book. November 27, 2018 Emilenelson (talk) 17:17, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review[edit]

An overall decent start! Your final version, of course, will require a bit more information and structure, but you have some good information that can help lead you into that more. I would say add more description of the piece itself, its form and more on its content. Also adding information on the context of the piece, like when and where was it made? What was going on around that time to influence its making? I find it interesting that the sarcophagus was actually probably pagan, even though it looks as if it has Christian iconography...expand on this more! Your argument is more neutral in the sense that you personally are not pushing any of your own ideas, however, I do believe that it would be a good idea to add a couple more sources to ensure that it's completely neutral. I look forward to your final!

Edmahle (talk) 20:03, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]