Talk:Saturday Night Live characters appearing on Weekend Update

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Drunk Girl[edit]

Hey, Jacqui, would you mind if we deleted one of the Drunk Girl pics? One of them is protruding into Fericito's listing now that they've been merged.

Whatever works. I'll play with them now and see if there's a way I can make them both fit, but if not, which do you think we should keep? I think the first is clearer, but the second is funnier. Jacqui^★ 04:50, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Some updates needed[edit]

I can think of two immediately that are not on here: Snooki and Stefon. If no one adds anything in a week's time, I'll do so myself. --A Gooner (talk) 20:12, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Order! Order in the court![edit]

Are the listings supposed to be in some kind of order? If so, can the intro state what order? If not, could they be? --Kgf0 23:41, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you're right... I can't tell what order they're in, if any. They should get in an order, or have the order clarified. I was thinking, however, that the characters that have their own articles should not have links in the header space with nothing underneath. It's a bit obnoxious to look at. So I do think some sort of redesign is in order... though I'm not sure how. Jacqui^★ 00:50, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry about that. It looks like it has been clarified by someone else; they are in chronological order. Leadpipevigilante 10:44, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can't they be in ABC order?

Do we need main articles?[edit]

I originally set this page up with links to full articles on the more popular characters, but since then I've realized that those articles aren't all that big, and wouldn't make this list too unmanageable if we just merged them (thanks by the way to Silence for making the article more awesome). Leadpipevigilante 10:44, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Wikiprecedent for things like List of Dragon Ball characters, and some discussion on a related AFD, agree as well: it's good to merge a bunch of small related articles on semi-notable subjects, like this, into a main article. If a character is so notable as to deserve a big article, give them one and link from here to a main article (should be very few characters if any, but I don't watch enough SNL to know how many or who). --DDerby-(talk) 05:31, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes lists subsection[edit]

I just realized that it's probably more relevant to note the anchor of Weekend Update at the time of each episode instead of the host (seeing as the host rarely appears on Update, and the anchors often interact with the correspondents). I used that format with Jacob Silj, which I just added. Leadpipevigilante 11:20, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hollywood Minute additions[edit]

I felt it would be plain wrong not to include the classic "schooling" of David Spade by Steve Martin, the event which seemed to bring an end to the Hollywood Minute segment. I added a paragraph describing the event. 68.147.54.71 03:04, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gayhitler.jpg[edit]

Image:Gayhitler.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Timcalhoun.png[edit]

Image:Timcalhoun.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Drunk girl 2.png[edit]

Image:Drunk girl 2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Father Guido Sarducci.jpg[edit]

The image Image:Father Guido Sarducci.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:03, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revamping lists of recurring sketches/characters[edit]

In an effort to address the massive disarray and random formatting of Wikipedia's coverage of recurring SNL sketches, I've begun an effort to merge the various lists and pages into a single list of recurring sketches, split by their year of introduction (i.e., beginning with Recurring Saturday Night Live characters and sketches introduced 1975-1976). The content of the following pages would be merged:

Among the issues that would be resolved are a) there would be a logical place for information about every SNL recurring sketch, instead of randomly highlighting those that happen to be about animals, music, or TV parodies; and b) it would be tremendously helpful in cleaning up the vast number of recurring-sketch redirects that currently go to pages that don't have any actual information about that sketch, because under the new format, we would know, based on the sketch's date of introduction, where information about that sketch would be located.

I have begun drafting these new pages in my userspace; the first is at User:Theoldsparkle/snl1 and they go sequentially from there (up to 10 right now). I would ask that any comments be centralized at User talk:Theoldsparkle/snl1. Theoldsparkle (talk) 22:14, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]