Talk:Save the Last One

Save the Last One has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 4, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Save the Last One/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Matthew R Dunn (talk · contribs) 02:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'll be reviewing this article. -- Matthew RD 02:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria[edit]

Well written: See notes below.
Sources: Reliable and verifiable, ✓ Pass.
Broadness in coverage: Covers the topic nicely ✓ Pass.
Neutral: Content represents article fairly, no bias, ✓ Pass.
Stable: No serious edit conflicts, ✓ Pass.
Images: One non-free image, appropriately tagged, other free image checks out too, ✓ Pass.

Comments[edit]

In the lead section point out that Sophia is missing.

Done

You could mention the critical impact of Shane shooting Otis in the lead section, seems like a rather big topic for the episode.

I think a lot of that is mentioned in the last paragraph already.

I just noticed the FA nomination for "What Lies Ahead", where the plot section was plagarised. Well unfortunately this episode's plot is the same as [www.thewalkingdeadepisode.com/the-walking-dead-2-episode-3-save-the-last-one-review/ this website]. You are not at fault DAP, but unfortunately IPs don't tend to realise how serious COPYVIO is.

Done

July first -> July 1

Done

Unlink Jon Bernthal in production section, per WP:REPEATLINK.

Done

Howabout change "Critical reception" section to just "reception" section, as it does mention the ratings.

Done

"Similarly, the episode became the second highest-rated program of the week dated October 30" You should mention the second highest-rated cable program, main network television tend to get more than one show that was seen by more than six million viewers (NCIS, Hawaii Five-0 and Grey's Anatomy for example)

Done

The review will be on hold until the issues are resolved. -- Matthew RD 16:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you would like me to make further adjustments to the Shane/Otis reaction, then it should be good to go. :) —DAP388 (talk) 21:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it looks good from where I'm standing (or sitting). Sorry it took me a while to respond back; I didn't put this page on my watchlist, and I was doing other Wiki things. Anyway I am happy to pass this, your first good article in the new year! -- Matthew RD 01:46, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Save the Last One. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111113200301/http://www.times-herald.com/Local/-Walking-Dead--TV-series-to-flim-at-Newnan-High--1713660 to http://www.times-herald.com/Local/-Walking-Dead--TV-series-to-flim-at-Newnan-High--1713660

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]